Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Turbine action group battles on

An action group against a proposed wind turbine in Checkley has held another public meeting as it continues to fight the controversial plans.

The Staffordshire Turbine Action Group (STAG) are campaigning against proposals by Severn Trent Water to build a wind monitoring mast at Checkley Sewage Works.

The group say that Severn Trent has told them they are considering a massive wind turbine being erected at the sewage works, one of the largest operating on-shore in the UK.

The turbine is expected to impact on nearby residents in the villages of Checkley, Fole and Deadman’s Green.

At the meeting, Mike Stigwood, an expert on fighting wind turbine applications, gave villagers a presentation about the likely noise nuisance levels from the proposed turbine.

One resident said after the presentation: “I was shocked to hear about another turbine site where a resident 900 metres away can not sleep at their home due to the dreadful noise.

“Many of the Checkley, Deadman’s Green and Fole residents live much closer to this proposed site, some as little as 350 metres away.”

STAG founder Keith Flunder told The Advertiser that the campaigners feel they are not being represented correctly in their fight.

He said: “The people who will be living closest to the proposed wind turbine will have little or no political representation during this planning application, as they live in Staffordshire Moorlands and the application will be considered by East Staffordshire Borough Council (ESBC).

“We are concerned about this situation, as it has already come to light that the information that ESBC and Severn Trent Water allowed to be in the public domain prior to the test mast application was inaccurate and had many errors in it.

“Mike showed us diagrams of this turbine compared to those next to the M6 and this is two-and-a-half times taller. In Europe they reject proposals for turbines less than 800 metres away from homes so why the government sees fit to allow one within 350 metres of homes here is beyond me.”

By James Brindle

Uttoxeter Advertiser

1 July 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts