Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

High Court hears legal challenge to wind farms

The conflict between the need to build wind farms in the battle against climate change and the need to preserve the country’s landscape heritage was highlighted yesterday in a High Court legal challenge.

The Peak District National Park Authority was attacking plans to build four 102-metre (335ft) wind turbines at Carsington Pastures, between Matlock and Ashbourne.

The proposed site is just outside the park and adjoins the Carsington Water beauty spot.

The scheme has been condemned by both local residents and tourists who enjoy walking the area, which includes the High Peak Trail, the Limestone Way and local paths.

Yesterday’s legal challenge has important general implications for wind farms near national parks.

Although it supports renewable energy schemes in principle, the Peak park authority fears the giant turbines will have a harmful visual impact on an otherwise protected landscape.

The authority and Derbyshire Dales District Council are jointly asking Lord Justice Carnwath, sitting at the High Court in London, to quash a planning inspector’s decision last September to approve the proposal.

Communities Secretary John Denham and the developers, Carsington Wind Energy Ltd, are opposing the application.

They argued in court that the inspector “reached a conclusion that is unimpeachable in terms of planning judgment”.

In his decision report, planning inspector Robin Brooks said: “I have concluded that the proposal would not unacceptably diminish the enjoyment of the countryside for the great majority of visitors to the Peak District National Park and Derbyshire in general, or of local residents.”

Anthony Crean QC, appearing for the park and council, argued the inspector had misconstrued planning law.

The case continues.

Yorkshire Post

30 June 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts