Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Wind turbines’ approval up in the air in Cohasset

COHASSET — The planning board will vote tonight on Cohasset’s first wind turbine project, seven months after it began a public hearing and more than a year after a wind bylaw was passed.

But the proposal, which calls for two 450-foot turbines, measured from base to blade tip, appears unlikely to get the unanimous support it needs.

The lone dissenting vote seems to be that of Stuart Ivimey, who said Tuesday that he was unlikely to change his mind at tonight’s meeting.

The two turbines, each capable of generating 1.65 megawatts of power, would be built near Hingham Lumber on Route 3A.

Ivimey says the developer has not met his burden of proof for the bylaw’s noise limitations.

When presenting noise data, the developer used “best-case scenario” numbers, Ivimey said..

Applicant James Sweeney of CCI Energy disputed Ivimey’s assertion that the turbines would be too noisy. His sound engineer used close to “worst-case” numbers, he said.

Board member Clark Brewer also disagreed, saying the applicant had not offered any numbers that were “unrealistic or exaggerated.”

Board members said they hope for a compromise. They agreed that outright rejection of the application would not be the best outcome.

Board member Charles Samuelson said he feared litigation from both the turbine opponents and CCI Energy.

The company plans to appeal if the proposal is rejected, but Sweeney would not elaborate on possible litigation.

Ivimey suggested that the board could approve just one turbine.

But Sweeney said that scenario “made no sense,” given that board members are not in agreement.

As a compromise, he and his partners are offering to put one turbine up, get feedback from the community about it, then put up the second, provided that the first has been found to meet all regulations and standards.

“I think that’s a big compromise,” Sweeney said, noting it would cost about $300,000 more to put the turbines up in phases.

Despite resident concerns about noise, the possibility of ice being thrown from turbine blades and the possibility of a turbine falling, board Chairman Alfred Moore said visual impact is the only “real issue” for most people.

“I think everything else in terms of objections is somewhat contrived,” Moore said. “Ultimately, that’s the criteria. Not that other things are unimportant, but they pale in comparison.”

The board will meet at 8 tonight at town hall.

By Allison Manning

The Patriot Ledger

6 May 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts