Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Windfarm foes deny climate change

Wind farms have no environmental benefits because carbon emissions are actually a good thing, a climate expert said in the Project Hayes hearing.

Dr Chris de Freitas, of Auckland University, appeared in the Queenstown Environment Court yesterday to give evidence for Roch Sullivan, who is opposing Meridian Energy’s Project Hayes wind farm in Central Otago.

The climate change sceptic said building wind farms would be of “no consequence” as carbon emissions had very little effect on the climate.

“If carbon dioxide is a feature causing climate change it is smaller than the natural variables,” he said.

“Moderate warming is hugely beneficial especially for a place like New Zealand that is agriculturally based.”

Climate variations in New Zealand have not coincided with carbon emissions rises and temperatures would only increase by one degree celsius in the next century, contrary to “climate alarmist” views, he said.

Dr de Freitas has previously argued against wind energy and urged the New Zealand Government to consider “clean coal”.

Meridian had argued that Project Hayes is part of a new renewable power supply and meeting New Zealand’s obligation to cut carbon emissions under the Kyoto Protocol.

Dr de Freitas dismissed the Kyoto protocol as a political rather than scientific agreement.

He also said climate change evidence previously presented by a Meridian expert “appealed to authority rather than gave evidence”.

Dr de Freitas’ method faced intense scrutiny by Meridian lawyer Hugh Rennie, QC, who questioned his scientific assumptions.

Mr Rennie asked why he had used NIWA data from 2004, when it had since altered the presentation of data in a way to reflect the impact of climate change more prominently.

Dr de Freitas dismissed the changes as “jiggery-pokery”, without explanation.

He also accused Mr Rennie of playing “legal gymnastics” to trick him into a position he did not wish to take. The hearing continues today.

Ben Heather

The Southland Times

30 January 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts