Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Ecological value of Lammermoor site studied at hearing

The ecological value of Central Otago’s Lammermoor Range was yesterday scrutinised at an Environment Court hearing into the Meridian Energy Project Hayes wind farm.

Appearing as a witness for the power company, terrestrial ecologist Dr Ruth Bartlett told four commissioners that 346 hectares of the 9200ha site would be disturbed during construction of the wind farm.

Upland Landscape Protection Society representative Ewan Carr asked Dr Bartlett whether the Project Hayes site was of higher ecological value than the location of the consented Mahinerangi wind farm.

‘‘Project Hayes certainly has a large continuous feature of snow tussock grassland,’’ Dr Bartlett replied.

‘‘It is less affected (than Mahinerangi) by full pasture improvement practices.’’

However, she said Mahinerangi had high ecological values equivalent to those of the Project Hayes site in areas such as waterways.

Citing a report by University of Otago emeritus professor Alan Mark, Maniototo Environmental Society lawyer Mike Holm suggested it would be ‘‘difficult, if not impossible’’ to revegetate the site in snow tussock following excavations, because of the poor viability of seeding and the short growing season at high altitude.

Dr Bartlett conceded that replanting would ‘‘not be an attempt to recreate a snow tussock grassland’’, and that additional seeding of exotic species would help to stabilise excavated land more quickly.

Alexandra resident Andrew Douglas asked why a comprehensive ecological assessment and cataloguing of the Project Hayes site had not been undertaken.

Dr Bartlett: ‘‘We would need to put in a great deal more effort . . . but that’s not the approach that’s been taken here, because it’s not necessarily helpful.’’

Commissioning minor preliminary reports and then building on them later if necessary was standard practice on projects of this type, she said.

By Will Hine

The Southland Times

29 January 2009

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts