Subscribe
Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Latest News RSS
loading...

Companies accused of dragging out wind farm inquiry

Companies seeking to build three wind farms came under fire yesterday for prolonging a public inquiry.

Developers AMEC, Steadings Wind Farm Ltd and Wind Prospect were accused of “unacceptable conduct” for their role in dragging an inquiry out to 10 months.

UK air traffic control body NATS En Route claimed the firms, who are seeking a combined 59 turbines near Kirkwhelpington, Northumberland, have put it at “an unnecessary cost” and forced it to pull experts away from their normal jobs.

The firm is objecting to the proposed wind farms on the basis of their impact on its radar.

And its barrister James Strachan told the inquiry, now hearing closing submissions, it had been “forced” to attend the hearing because developers would not agree a statement of common ground on the radar issue at the outset.

But he said companies now accept there would be an impact on the radar.

Addressing planning inspector David Rose, sitting at Tynedale Council chamber in Hexham, Mr Strachan said the developers’ actions were “no way to conduct the planning process”.

He said: “Why has it taken so long to get to this point? There is no reasonable answer other than the unacceptable conduct of the developers.”

The inquiry had earlier heard the closing statement of Newcastle International Airport, which is also objecting on the grounds of the effect of turbines on its air traffic control radar.

Barrister Thomas Hill claimed the developers had “hit the jackpot” by managing to attract objections from three different aviation bodies, the third being the Ministry of Defence.

Mr Hill said the developers had proposed “a ragbag” of “hairbrained schemes”, such as marking wind farm locations on the radar screen and switching the radar off. The inquiry also heard closing arguments from the objecting Tynedale Council.

It will resume on Tuesday, December 16, for closing statements from the MoD and the three applicants. Amec Project Investments Ltd is seeking to erect 20 turbines at Ray Estate, Wind Prospect Developments Ltd wants 18 60m structures at Green Rigg Fell, Birtley, and Steadings Wind Farm Ltd is proposing 21 at Steadings, Kirkwhelpington.

The Journal

20 November 2008

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts