Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Controversial wind farm bid is thrown out

Controversial plans for a wind farm in a rural beauty spot appear doomed after they were thrown out by a second local authority.

Broadview Energy Developments had hoped to build five 125m wind turbines, between Hilton and Seamer, close to Yarm, near Stockton.

At a meeting yesterday, the development management committee of Hambleton District Council refused permission for two of the planned towers.

Stockton Borough Council last month rejected the other three turbines in the development, which would straddle the two district boundaries.

The district council’s planning officers had recommended the application be given planning permission.

Members of the planning committee visited the site of the proposed development last week.

More than 320 letters of objection were received and Seamer and Hilton Wind Action Group (Shwag) was formed to fight the plans.

Shwag members won the support of local MPs William Hague and Dari Taylor, as well as Euro MPs and environmentalist Dr David Bellamy.

Jeffrey Corrigan, managing director of Broadview, said the company would consider its position before deciding whether to appeal.

A packed public gallery at Northallerton Civic Centre heard that objectors’ concerns centred on the potential impact on residents and the effect of the turbines on the surrounding landscape, including Roseberry Topping and the North York Moors.

As well as representations from Shwag and Broadview, the committee also heard from a Friends of the Earth co-ordinator, who expressed support for the development.

After a lengthy debate, members voted eight to three in favour of refusal.

After the decision, a Shwag spokesman said: “My immediate reaction is that this is the correct result. I am sure it will go to appeal – and we will be ready if it does.”

Mr Corrigan said: “We are extremely disappointed by the committee’s decision.

We worked closely with the district council and other organisations to ensure we have a proposal that fitted in with the Government’s energy targets and, more importantly, is suitable to the immediate landscape.

“We did not consider this development lightly and still feel it is a prime site for a small wind farm.”

Councillor Bryn Griffiths, district council member for Stokesley, the relevant Hambleton ward, voted against the plan.

He said: “I am very pleased that the planning committee has listened to the views of local residents.

I am in favour of renewable energy, but this was the wrong development at the wrong site.”

By Andy Walker

The Northern Echo

14 November 2008

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts