Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

High court appeal on Carsington wind-farm plan

Senior Members of the Peak District National Park Authority have given the go-ahead for a High Court challenge to plans for a wind-farm near the national park boundary.

Working together with Derbyshire Dales District Council, the National Park Authority is to make a joint appeal against a scheme for four 102-metre (335ft) wind-turbines at Carsington Pastures, between Matlock and Ashbourne.

Carsington Wind Energy Ltd’s proposal was approved by a planning inspector in September following an eight-day public inquiry in July. Although just outside the national park, the site is very close to its protected landscape, and adjoins the beauty-spot of Carsington Water.

Derbyshire Dales District Council’s original rejection was supported by the Peak District National Park Authority because of its major impact on the landscape.

National Park Authority planning committee chair Hilda Gaddum explained: “The giant scale of these turbines would have a visual impact well within the national park.

“Our statutory responsibility, and that of all national park authorities, is to protect the natural, unspoiled beauty of the landscape for generations to come.

“The crux of our case is that the applicants should have been required to consider alternative schemes or sites that would not have such an adverse impact on a protected landscape.

“This is an important case, not just for us, but for future applications near the boundaries of other national parks.”

Derbyshire Dales District Council Leader, Lewis Rose commented: “Whilst the District Council has never questioned the desirability or need to promote renewable energy sources, there is a clear need to undertake a balanced assessment of such proposals. In the absence of considering alternative sites, such a balanced judgement cannot be reached.”

In his decision report, planning inspector Robin Brooks said: “I have concluded that the proposal would not unacceptably diminish the enjoyment of the countryside for the great majority of visitors to the Peak District National Park and Derbyshire in general, or of local residents.”

In September the Authority objected to another proposal just outside its boundary — for five 125-metre (410ft) turbines at Sheephouse Heights in Barnsley Metropolitan Borough. There are already 16 other turbines in the vicinity.

The Authority emphasised it supported renewable energy schemes in principle, but these wind-farms were too prominent to be acceptable close to the protected landscape of a national park, and other alternatives should be explored.

07 November 2008

derbyshiretimes.co.uk

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts