Protest puts the wind up turbines scheme
Protesters descended on a public exhibition yesterday to vent their feelings over a proposed wind farm for Purbeck.
The demonstration was organised by Dorset Against Rural Turbines (Dart) at the Springfield Hotel in Wareham as Wimborne-based firm Infinergy put its plans for the Master’s Pit site at East Stoke on display.
There has been fervent opposition to the scheme, which Infinergy has reduced from six turbines to four after a consultation. It says it is now ready to resubmit the plans to Purbeck District Council.
Those against the proposals say it is the wrong place for a wind farm.
Terry Stewart, president of the Dorset Campaign to Protect Rural England, said: “These turbines will be 410ft (125m) high, taller than Salisbury Cathedral, and will totally dominate the Purbeck Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and the World Heritage Coast.
“The wind in Dorset is intermittent, many days with no wind, so the turbines always have to have a fossil fuel or nuclear power station as a back-up.”
But not everyone is battling against the Alaska Wind Farm project. Janet Payne, from support group Yes to Wind, said: “Their only argument against it is it’s going to spoil the view; I think it’s complete ‘nimbyism’, it’s selfish to object to it.
“Climate change is the biggest thing that we’re facing at the moment and we’ve got to go with wind. It’s clean, it’s renewable, it’s free.
“It’s a quarry site, it’s a brownfield site and wind turbines are better than other possibilities it could be used for.”
The exhibition gave locals the chance to find out more about the project and view photo mock-ups of the turbines.
Infinergy says the four turbines would generate 9.2mw of electricity, about 11-13 per cent of Dorset’s target from renewable sources for 2010.
Project director Herb Lindlahr said that despite the reduction in the number of turbines, the project was still viable and would make a “valuable contribution” to Dorset’s renewable energy targets.
l More details can be found at alaskawindfarm.co.uk.
By Steven Smith
3 November 2008
Tags: Wind power, Wind energy
Some possibly related stories:
The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.
