Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    Economics, politics drive wind debate

    Twin uncertainties — economics and politics — surround the industrial wind turbine controversy in Potter County as two separate developers plot their strategies while elected officials consider regulations.

    No one can say for sure if, or when, the massive white structures will ever go up in those areas initially targeted by the wind industry, but the turbine debate has created a chasm that pits neighbor against neighbor, while turning up the heat on township and county leaders.

    Economists have warned that the tightening of credit markets in recent weeks could stall the surge in renewable energy development, particularly industrial wind power and solar energy. Without sufficient capital available, arguments over turbine siting standards could be moot.

    At least five townships are considering regulations at the same time the Potter County Board of Commissioners moves closer to releasing the draft of a countywide ordinance.

    Apparently, any local measure that is less restrictive than the county’s ordinance prevails. Therefore, each township has the power to adopt rules that are more accommodating to the wind turbine industry.

    And that’s just what Homer Township and, most recently, Hebron Township have done. Supervisors in each of those municipalities have passed ordinances that would allow wind turbines, which could be 410 feet or taller, to be built within 750 feet of a neighboring residence.

    An early draft of the commissioners’ ordinance calls for setbacks of 2,000 feet, or six times the height of the turbine, whichever distance is greater.

    Both township ordinances and the county’s proposal also impose limits on how much noise generated by an industrial turbine will be permissible at adjacent properties.

    Sweden, Eulalia and Ulysses townships are also considering local wind energy ordinances.

    Meanwhile, the Potter County Commissioners continue to receive input and inquiries from citizens on the status of the county’s proposed regulations.

    “At this time, the board is assessing scientific studies and other information recently presented, while reviewing testimony from the Sept. 11 public hearing,” the commissioners reported on their website, news.pottercountypa.net.

    They also invited two developers who have expressed an interest in developing industrial wind facilities in Potter County to this Thursday’s commissioners’ meeting for further discussions.

    AES Corporation, an international energy giant, has blueprints calling for construction of 79 turbines on high-altitude farmland in Ulysses and Hector townships.

    A separate plan, advanced by developer Mike Mulcahey of Port Allegany, has been less defined, but involves properties in Homer, Hebron, Sweden and Eulalia townships, near Coudersport.

    Phone calls, emails and letters continue to arrive in the commissioners’ office from citizens offering input on the proposed regulations, the board reported.

    At their Sept. 25 meeting, the commissioners heard a detailed presentation from a Sweden Township resident, Martha Young, requesting longer setbacks of turbines from neighboring properties; escrow/buyout provisions for non-participating property owners who decide to sell their holdings because of the impact of the turbines on their quality of life; requirements on wind developers for job-creation and financial contributions to local governments, and other provisions. Young delivered to the commissioners a series of studies and other materials on industrial wind energy.

    The commissioners said their goal is to conclude work on the draft wind energy ordinance soon, submit it to the Potter County Planning Commission for that group’s input, and make it available for public review. That process will also include a date for the scheduled adoption of the ordinance.

    Endeavor News

    11 October 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power