Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    Residents discuss wind farm proposal

    Over 80 villagers from Strensham, Twyning and Ripple packed into Strensham village hall last night to discuss proposals for three wind turbines close to Strensham village.

    Protesters heard that there would be a fly-past at 6pm today to illustrate the height of the proposed turbines which, at 126m high, they claim would dominate the landscape.

    The proposed development on farmland would put the nearest turbine just 650m from the south west edge of Strensham village.

    Lib Dem parliamentary candidate Richard Burt pledged his support for the campaign.

    He said: “There is clearly a need to develop renewable energy to combat global warming. We have only got to look as far as the river Severn to see the results of climate change.

    “However, government has failed to protect the rights of residents as developers look for any site that would give them guaranteed profits for the lifetime of the scheme.

    “These wind turbines would be enormous within the local landscape, with rotor blades similar to the wingspan of a jumbo jet.

    “They will cause flicker from rotating blades at sunrise and sunset for residents living east and west of the turbines, others may suffer sleep loss and health problems from noise and oscillation, and house prices may fall.

    “Government should ensure a minimum two- kilometre distance between any proposed development and the nearest homes, similar to regulations in place in Scotland and elsewhere in Europe.”

    Malvern Gazette

    8 October 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power