Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    Wind farm developers offering 'bribes' to local communities, campaigners say

    Developers are “bribing” communities to back wind farms by offering to pay for lunch clubs for pensioners and children’s play parks, according to campaigners.

    The Campaign for the Protection of Rural England (CPRE) say at least 35 communities have been offered so called “goodwill” payments — one for every English region — by developers interested on building wind farms in the area.

    The payments, also known as “community funds”, can be worth millons of pounds over the lifetime of a wind farm and pay for a range of projects, from bird watching events to sailing clubs.

    The CPRE say the payments could be seen as “paying for planning permission” and do not offer as much money as communities deserve from wind farms. The organisation is calling on the Government to outlaw the system and instead force companies to contribute to environmental or rural schemes whenever a development goes ahead.

    However, developers say the payments are a transparent and routine part of “corporate social responsibility” which offers money to the community where large scale developments are planned.

    The CPRE looked at a range of wind farm developments, either at the planning stage or operational, that had offered money to the community either as a one-off or over the life of the wind farm.

    Paul Miner, CPRE’s senior planning campaigner, said the payments could be seen as “bribes”.

    “What is concerning us is generally these kind of things would not be allowed in planning system because they would be seen as bribes or buying planning permission,” he said.

    “If this is allowed to become widespread then it is going to lead to people thinking planning permission can be bought and sold.”

    Mr Miner also said communities would be entitled to more money from the windfarm if payments were made an official part of the planning process.

    “By accepting them, communities may also be getting a worse deal than they would if wind farm developers were made to offer them through the planning system,” he added.

    The CPRE is campaigning for the Government to outlaw goodwill payments in the new Planning Bill going through the Lords and instead make wind farms liable to a levy that will go towards small scale renewables, district heating or countryside improvments in the area.

    Mr Miner added: “CPRE supports the need to increase investment in renewable energy, including wind energy, but goodwill payments threaten to bring the planning system into disrepute and are questionable even on the grounds of the need for more renewable energy. We believe that the solution is to outlaw these payments completely.

    “Energy companies should be required to work through the planning process in the same way as any other developer.”

    However a spokesman for the British Wind Energy Association said it was “outrageous” to suggest community funds could be unlawful.

    He said community funds were set up in partnership with prominent members of the community as a way of ensuring the local area benefits from a development, for example by renovating an historic building or furnishing a sports club.

    “To suggest that there is an unlawful element and bribery is outrageous,” he said. “The way things work, this is a way local communities can share profits from a wind farm.”

    Developers E.ON and RES routinely offer a community fund for any large scale industrial development. Both companies said it was a transparent process designed to enable communities to directly benefit from development in their area.

    By Louise Gray
    Environment Correspondent

    Telegraph

    7 October 2008

    Click here for the CPRE report.

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power