Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    Tuki wind farm timing unknown

    The next stage of the Tuki wind farm will be unknown until the end of the year.

    Wind Power met with Hepburn Shire Council last week, after mounting community concern about the proposal.

    There has been community speculation over whether the proposal will go ahead at Tuki and how many turbines it would involve.

    In June, wind farm opposition group Spa Country Landscape Guardians claimed the project had ended due to community opposition.

    But Wind Power told The Courier the project’s future depended on the unknown nature of the Emissions Trading Scheme and carbon prices, and it expected more details later this year.

    Originally, 19 turbines were earmarked for the proposal, but in 2007 it was revised to be up to 50 turbines.

    Wind Power spokesman Ross Richards said once the company gained relevant information it could revisit the proposal and determine its direction.

    If it did go ahead, Mr Richards said Wind Power would lodge an application in early 2009.

    One of the community concerns discussed last week between the council and Wind Power was the Significant Landscape Overlay.

    Some hill-tops in the project’s area are protected in council’s planning scheme by an SLO.

    While the council is not for or against wind farms, Mayor Tim Hayes said he believed the SLO would be a factor in determining an application by Wind Power.

    Wind Power has received draft legal advice stating an SLO would not prevent the project’s development.

    If the wind farm is proposed to be more than 30 megawatts, it will go directly to the State Government planning panel for consideration. The council can then comment on the application but not determine it.

    The council recently developed draft Wind Energy Facility Guidelines, to be considered with the community by the council in November.

    The Courier

    6 October 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power