Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    Developer says wind plan will fly in Annapolis; 10 turbines envisioned for former Navy communications site along the Severn River

    Nearly a decade after the Navy retired and dismantled 19 communications towers along the Severn River, a fledgling energy company is planning to build wind turbines that would turn the near-constant breeze there into electricity.

    David Murrin, a merchant mariner who has formed a partnership with his lifelong friend, developer and marina owner Marcellous Butler, wants to build up to 10 high-tech windmills near the Naval Academy at Greenbury Point — enough, he said to provide power for as many as 10,000 homes.

    Despite the current financial crises, the partners have investors lined up to back the $30 million to $40 million project, Murrin said.

    “We haven’t finished organizing the company, but we’ve built a team with financial experience and some who have worked with wind farms,” said Murrin., who would not identify potential investors. “We have had to hold people back with a fire hose, there’s that much interest in the concept.”

    After developing the plan for nearly three years, Murrin and Butler met last month with county and federal officials and business leaders to outline the proposal.

    Del. Ron George, a Republican from Arnold, contacted a dozen or more officials and organized the meeting.

    “We think this is definitely a doable project,” said George. “This is at the very beginning stage, but it’s got tremendous potential. They’ve been working on this for three years.”

    The Navy, which owns the land at Greenbury Point, has not taken a position on the proposal.

    “We’re certainly aware of the interest,” said Philip A. Molter, a spokesman for Naval District Washington, which oversees support operations in Annapolis. “At this stage, there doesn’t seem to be much to say without a firm proposal.”

    County officials, however, are intrigued by what they’ve heard about the plans.

    The 300-foot tall turbines would be about half the height of the three county-owned communications towers at the site, Murrin said.

    The county has used remaining towers from the former naval radio transmitter facility on the peninsula as relay towers for its 800-megahertz emergency radio system, said Fred Schram, central services officer for Anne Arundel County.

    “It’s been a great asset for the county because we don’t have communication dead zones anymore, even in rural parts of the county,” he said.

    The county must decide whether wind turbines would affect the communications towers. Of the turbine proposal, Schram said, “We’ll see how it goes along from this early stage.”

    The radio towers, known to locals as the “Eiffel Towers,” provided key defense communications to U.S. ships and submarines during World War II but ceased broadcasting in 1996. The Navy bought the property — where the Wright brothers had tested experimental planes — in 1909.

    The next step in the turbine proposal, Murrin said, would be to install more sophisticated equipment to verify average daily wind speed and direction. The site is considered among the best anywhere on the bay, he said, averaging 11.3 knots (about 13 mph) of daily wind speed. To be effective, he said, the turbines require an average wind speed of at least 10 knots.

    Murrin says infrastructure is in place to connect turbines to a regional electrical grid.

    Molter, the Navy spokesman, said a Navy engineering analysis would have to be conducted to determine whether the existing infrastructure can handle the amount of power the turbines might generate. Ultimately, the Navy would decide the proposal’s fate.

    By Chris Guy

    The Baltimore Sun

    5 October 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power