Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    ThWART begins campaign against new turbines plan

    A plan to build three wind turbines in an area of outstanding natural beauty will seriously damage one of only three 360-degree panoramic Ordnance Survey viewpoints on the Island, according to campaign group ThWART (The Wight Against Rural Turbines).

    In a statement issued this week, it said the nearest turbine would be sited just 400 metres from centre of the viewpoint, and even closer to the Worsley Trail bridleway. It also highlighted, if agreed, the turbines would be situated on Limerstone Down, not Cheverton.

    Steve Allen, development manager at renewable energy provider Cornwall Light and Power (CLP), said the landscape and the visual effect of the ‘wind cluster’ would form a very important part of their environmental impact assessment, submitted as part of a planning application.

    “Ultimately a lot of people actually like the look of the wind turbines once they are up and operating,” he said.

    But ThWART supporter Julian Bagnall, a local resident and owner of the Island Fish Farm, said: “Until now, we had no idea they were proposing to build such massive turbines on Limerstone Down because we have not been properly consulted.

    “This project will have a massive impact on our lives and utterly destroy the beautiful landscape which visitors come here to enjoy.

    “Why on earth are they planning this industrial monstrosity in an AONB near our Heritage Coast? This is the wrong project in the wrong place and I am appalled it is being supported by an Island business.”

    Mr Allen said the four public exhibitions gave people the chance to air their views.
    “This is early days in our consultation programme and we are keen to engage with the Island as a whole,” he added.

    Plan ‘too good to turn away’

    THE man at the forefront of plans to build three 125-metre wind turbines on Limerstone Down urged the Island not to let a great opportunity pass.

    Speaking at the first of a series of public exhibitions this week, Steve Allen, development manager at Cornwall Light and Power (CLP), said people should consider the greater benefits in terms of green electricity, Island manufacturing, future jobs and research and development.

    He said: “The one thing that really makes me think this is the right thing to do, once the turbines come to the end of their operational life, they can be removed from the landscape and leave no long-term legacy of pollution or hazardous waste. For the 25 to 30 years, they are consistently producing green electricity with no carbon dioxide emissions.”

    Planning permission for a wind farm with three smaller turbines already has permission but CLP said the much bigger turbines it wants will produce ten times as much clean power. A joint application with Vestas is being planned, the Newport company using the site for research and development.

    At the exhibition at Shorwell Village Hall, village resident Shane Sothcott said: “I think people will get use to them and learn to look at it in a positive light.”

    Whitwell resident, Oswald Hoskyns, who teaches countryside skills, agreed: “I can see no reason not to have these things in the countryside. I have been around Europe and they are all over the place and are very beautiful.”

    But Michael Langley, of Limerstone, said: “Why don’t they put them somewhere where nobody lives? They seem to want to put them near populated areas.”

    If allowed, Gertrude Masters, of Shorwell, feared the development could open the door to more turbines while Philip Marshall, also of Shorwell, accepted a need for renewable energy but described the proposed wind farm as an eyesore.

    By Martin Neville

    Isle of Wight County Press

    5 September 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power