Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    Wind turbine firm 'might appeal'

    The firm behind rejected plans to build a windfarm on the Shropshire-Staffordshire border is considering appealing against the council decision.

    Nuon Renewables said the site near Norton-in-Hales was the ideal spot for seven 360ft (110m) wind turbines.

    North Shropshire District Council threw out the plans at a meeting on Tuesday after they had been similarly rejected by Newcastle-under-Lyme Council.

    The firm said it was “disappointed” and would study the decision carefully.

    The company has said the turbines would produce enough energy to power 6,000 homes.

    ‘Best option’

    But more than 2,000 letters of objection were sent to the council by local residents.

    Councillors rejected the plans, saying they would have “an unacceptable adverse impact” on listed buildings nearby.

    Nuon Renewables Project director Graham Davey said the plans had been recommended for approval by officers at North Shropshire District Council.

    He added that it was “unlikely” that the firm would consider an alternative site.

    He said: “The site at Poplar Lane was chosen after three years of fairly careful study.

    “We looked at other sites both in Shropshire and outside in Cheshire and Staffordshire.

    “We came up with the Poplar Lane site because we felt it was the best option.”

    BBC News

    4 September 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power