Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    DeWitt considers limiting windmills

    Suburban DeWitt is the latest town to grapple with how to handle wind turbines.

    The planning board is proposing an ordinance that would ban from residential properties the tall, bladed turbines most typically in use, chair Michael Lazar said. But the ordinance would allow another, less common type of wind conversion generator — a vertical axis wind turbine, he said.

    Typical wind turbines or windmills would be permitted only on land zoned for industrial or high-tech use, Lazar said. They could be no higher than 50 feet, or 30 feet higher than the principal building on the property, he said.

    The town board will hold a public hearing and discussion on the proposed ordinance, among others, at 7:30 p.m. Monday at the town hall, 5400 Butternut Drive.

    Vertical-style systems are better suited to residential areas, Lazar said. He said they are quieter, smaller and shorter than the blade-type windmills.

    Most of the towns that are discussing the windmill issues are rural and have more open land than DeWitt, he said.

    “We don’t have those kinds of areas available, so we have to be much more restrictive because basically it’s homes next to each other,” Lazar said.

    Town Supervisor Ed Michalenko said the town wants to encourage alternative energy use. He said he does not favor banning any single area of technology — for instance, the bladed windmill. He said he will scrutinize the ordinance proposed by the planning board and expects the rest of the town board to do the same.

    “We want to be friendly to this type of technology and encourage its use, but we also don’t want to expose nearby residents to liability, noise, and we also want to protect aesthetics,” he said.

    By Maureen Nolan
    Staff writer

    The Post-Standard

    4 September 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power