Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

Latest News RSS
loading...
News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • ALL

    Wind turbine ordinance's proposed changes to be discussed at public hearing

    Property owners in Manitowoc County installing small wind turbines likely won’t be required to own large lots of land to locate their energy-generating systems, according to proposed county ordinance revisions supported by members of a county commission.

    The Manitowoc County Planning and Park Commission voted unanimously at its Monday meeting in favor of the proposed revisions, said Mike Demske, commission director.

    The revisions are expected to head to the Manitowoc County Board of Supervisors for a vote in October, he said.

    The proposed changes come after a town of Schleswig couple and others told the County Board the county’s existing ordinance contains requirements that make it impossible to install a turbine on their own property.

    The revisions would mean property owners would no longer be required to locate their turbines at least 1,000 feet from any dwelling on their neighbor’s property, according to Demske.

    Instead, a landowner would have set back the turbine at least two times the turbine’s total height from a neighbor’s property line and from any public road or power line right-of-way, said Demske.

    Residents can comment on the proposed changes at a public hearing of the Planning and Park Commission at 4 p.m. on Sept. 22 at the Manitowoc County Office Complex, 4319 Expo Drive, Manitowoc.

    Commission members could vote after the hearing to send the proposed revisions to the County Board, Demske said.

    The Planning and Park Commission is made up of members of the public and County Board supervisors.
    Proposed revisions

    In 2006, county officials enacted two ordinances — one for turbines 170 feet or shorter and another for turbines taller than 170 feet — after residents voiced concerns about potential public health and safety issues with turbines located near their backyards.

    Navitas Energy Inc. had proposed to build a 49-turbine wind farm in Two Rivers, Mishicot and Two Creeks, dubbed the Twin Creeks Wind Park.

    On Monday, the commission voted 7-0 in favor of creating two ordinances – one for “very small” turbines and one for “small” turbines.

    Under the revisions, a “very small” turbine would be 120 feet tall or less and have the capacity of 40 kilowatts or less. A “small” turbine would be 170 feet tall or less and have the capacity of 100 kilowatts or less.

    No changes are being proposed for the county’s large wind energy systems ordinance that regulates turbines at 170 feet or taller, Demske said.

    The noise restrictions in the current county turbine ordinances would remain in the revised ordinances.

    The current ordinances require the turbine be set back from an adjacent property line and from any public road or power line right-of-way.

    Under the revisions, that set back for both “very small” and “small” turbine would increase from 1.2 times the turbine’s total height to 2 times its height.

    Property owners also would be subject to less extensive site plan requirements under the revisions.

    Currently, those seeking a permit must pay a $100 fee and submit multiple copies of detailed site plans to the commission for review, he said.

    The proposed revisions would remove the fee, he said.

    In addition, if property owners submit a site plan that meets the ordinance’s requirements, “we can give them a permit on the spot” without a delay in taking it to the commission for approval, he said.

    By Kristopher Wenn

    Manitowoc Herald Times Reporter

    28 August 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: Wind power, Wind energy


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    Loading ...
    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.
    Formerly at windwatch.org.

    Get the Facts
    key words:  national wind watch, nationalwindwatch.org, windwatch, wind-watch.org; industrial wind energy, industrial wind power; wind action group, windfarm action group, wind power and wind energy opposition, wind opponents; windmill, wind farm, windfarm, wind tower, wind turbine; wind energy facts, wind energy myths, truth about wind; wind power and wind energy news, information, resources, research, photos, graphics, videos, DVDs, wind videos; wind power and wind energy impacts, problems with wind power, arguments against wind power, negatives of wind energy, wind turbine syndrome, wind turbine and windfarm noise, pros and cons of wind power, risks of wind energy, how wind energy works, arguments against wind power