Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

A lot more than minor irritations

I have read the letter by Viv Dodd (News & Star, August 2) a number of times. Is this a wind up?

Real political leadership and courage from Jamie Reed and Tony Cunningham indeed? It is the minister, John Hutton, who makes the decision not backbenchers.

What I find outrageous about the letter is reference to “minor irritants” such as noise and visual impact.

I would suggest that he reads the article, ‘Windfarms could cut house prices by 50 per cent (The Cumberland News, August 2) and then he will understand that there is nothing minor at all regarding the problems of windfarms.

He clearly supports the planning application for Cumwhinton where the value of the property and the amenity is likely to be severely blighted.

Who would take a risk buying property where there is the possibility of a windfarm?

If so many people love wind turbines, why do house prices depreciate, rather than appreciate, where there is an application for windfarm?

The problem of noise is not a minor irritation either, as the case of Jane Davis in Lincolnshire exemplifies.

The situation for the Davises is that they now have a property which they can’t live in because of the torment of noise and a property which they can’t put on the market.

The Davis home is approximately 1,000 yards from turbines, roughly twice the distance of those proposed for Newlands-Cumwhinton village.

The Davis case, which was reported in the national press has very important significance.

A tribunal found in their favour and their house has been rebanded for council tax purposes.

I suspect that in the coming months those minor irritations referred to in the letter will become a major headache for councils.

GEOFFREY GRAHAM
Greystoke

News & Star

11 August 2008

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts