Quantcast
Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • ALL
    Powered by WordPress
    Log in

    More doubts over wind turbine; Head of Lambourn Trainers' Association, Peter Walwyn, calls for public inquiry into plans

    Further doubts have been raised over plans for a Lambourn wind turbine.

    The head of Lambourn Trainers’ Association, Peter Walwyn (pictured), has called for a public inquiry into plans to build an 81 metre high wind turbine in Lambourn.

    The latest application for permission to build the turbine in Baydon Road, which is in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), was originally refused in December last year.

    Applicant Matthew Partridge, who hopes the turbine will generate electricity for the national grid, is appealing against this decision.

    There were objections to the plans when the application was made, and now that an appeal has been lodged, there is a chance for people to send in comments to central government’s Planning Inspectorate.

    Mr Walwyn said he wanted to see the case dealt with openly. “I think people in Lambourn are asking for a public inquiry, and I think it is necessary, to discuss the facts,” he said.

    He questioned how efficient wind farms are, and called them unsightly.

    “We do not need a wind turbine in Lambourn,” he said. “It is the wrong place for one. The turbine would also be next to the M4 motorway, so people would be stopping and staring at it all the time, which may well cause congestion.”

    The man behind the plans, Matthew Partridge, said: “We’ve had far more people in support of the turbine than against it. If the plans go ahead, I have an agreement with an energy company for the windmill to be community-owned, so if someone owned a 1% share in it, they would receive 1% of the profits.

    “There is a wind farm in Oxfordshire that works like this, and I hold shares in it.”

    He said his reason for lodging the appeal was that planning policy has changed since his last application. “You are now able to have up to four wind turbines in an AONB,” he said. “There is also a policy that you should have renewable energy sources near transport links, and you can’t get much closer to a transport link than right next to the M4 motorway.”

    Comments on the appeal can be made in writing to the inspectorate by August 19.

    By Clare Hardy, Reporter

    Newbury Today

    18 July 2008

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: ,


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.

    Get the Facts