Subscribe

Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Windfarm firm looks at new site

Wind energy specialist Enertrag is testing opinion on plans for a second windfarm in south Norfolk.

The Diss-based company, which is already being opposed over proposals for seven wind turbines at Hempnall, now has plans for six more at Tivetshall St Mary.

And Michael Windridge, who is leading the campaign against the Hempnall turbines, has accused Enertrag of declaring “a full-scale war on the Norfolk landscape”.

The Enertrag proposals for Tivetshall are revealed in what is called a “scoping request” to South Norfolk Council. This sets out what the company intends and asks the council what issues it needs to address to support any application it submits.

The request shows that Enertrag plans six 125m turbines on farmland at New Road.

The company says that the nearest houses are 700m away and that it has an agreement to buy the land if planning permission is granted. Construction is expected to take five to six months.

Mr Windridge, who is a South Norfolk councillor, said: “I hope Enertrag’s latest move will provoke a genuine debate among Norfolk people about the real value which we attach to our rural landscape, and whether we care about protecting it.”

He said that Enertrag was trying again to dump large scale industrial structures in the countryside and undermining the case for renewable energy because wind turbines were inefficient and produced only a “derisory” amount of electricity.

However, David Linley, the manager of projects for Enertrag, said that its windfarm at Pickenham, near Swaffham, produced electricity for 9,000 homes, which was not derisory.

Although wind turbines were still a relatively rare sight in the countryside, they were not industrial in the way that chimneys or factories were, they were quiet and they were not polluting, he said.

“If we are going to meet green targets, we have to accept change,” added Mr Linley.

By Martn Throssell

Diss Express

22 February 2008

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts