Quantcast
Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • ALL
    Powered by WordPress
    Log in

    Wind farm opponents face steep costs if Meridian taken to Environment Court

    Opponents of the Project Hayes wind farm faced a bill of up to $90,000 if they chose to take Meridian Energy to the Environment Court, according to groups that have been through the process.

    Consent was given to the energy giant this week to build a 176-turbine wind farm on the Lammermoor Range, south of Ranfurly.

    Makara Guardians took Meridian to court over a 70-turbine wind farm that was approved for Wellington’s west coast.

    The court upheld that decision but it trimmed four turbines off the original proposal and the height of the turbines was reduced from 125m to about 111m. The cost of the appeal was $89,000, of which $33,000 was covered by legal aid.

    Guardians treasurer John Mills said the money was spent bringing in experts in noise pollution, resource consent law and landscape.

    “You’ve got to get the very best experts … because you have to be credible. Emotion doesn’t count in court. It’s a dry, factual exercise.” Historian Patrick Parsons , a member of the Outstanding Landscapes Preservation Society, agreed.

    The society took Unison Networks to the Environment Court twice over plans to add 37 turbines to a 15-turbine wind farm near Hastings.

    “You need expert witnesses to maximise the value of your argument,” he said. The society spent $30,000 on a top solicitor and $15,000 on a resource consent expert.

    Each challenge cost the society about $80,000, of which $30,000 was covered by legal aid. The society’s second challenge saw Unison’s approval revoked, a decision the power company is now challenging in the High Court.

    Mr Parsons said that although an appeal could be expensive for Project Hayes opponents, it would be heard in front of the right people.

    “… When you get to the Environment Court you’re immediately dealing with specialists who aren’t going to have the wool pulled over their eyes.”

    By Will Hine

    The Southland Times

    2 November 2007

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: ,


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.

    Get the Facts