Subscribe
Key Documents

Resource Library

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Location/Source

Latest News RSS
loading...

Court overstepped turbine mark, says Unison

The Environment Court overstepped its mark by ruling against an application to build 37 wind turbines in Hawke’s Bay, says Unison Networks.

The lines company told the High Court at Napier yesterday that the Environment Court was not entitled to overrule a public plan.

Unison lawyer Paul Majurey said the area where the company wanted to build the turbines — Te Waka Range, near the Titiokura Summit on the Napier-Taupo Road — was not within an outstanding natural feature area in Hastings District Council Plan, yet the Environment Court had determined it should have been.

Jolene Patuawa, on behalf of Maungaharuru-Tangitu Society Incorporated and Ngati Hineuru Iwi Incorporated, and Michael McClelland, on behalf of the Outstanding Landscape Preservation Society, responded to the appeal.

Both argued there was provision for a consent authority to “have regard to” any matter it “considers reasonable and necessary to determine the application”, including “the protection of outstanding natural features and landscapes from inappropriate subdivision, use, and development”.

Ms Patuawa said a major reason for the Environment Court’s decision had been the potential “adverse effects on the relationship of Maori with this land and the values it has for them” — a point she said the appellant “completely ignores”.

Mr McClelland said the council itself had at the Environment Court hearing accepted that Te Waka Range was an outstanding natural landscape, yet had been aware it was not noted as such in the District Plan.

Mr Majurey said Unison was not disputing the finding the proposal could have adverse effects on the relationship with Maori, but if the High Court found the Environment Court had crossed its constitutional boundaries, that could be ruled reason enough for the application to be revisited. Justice Judith Potter reserved her decision.

By Mary Sharpe

The Dominion Post

stuff.co.nz

4 September 2007

Bookmark and Share

Tags: Wind power, Wind energy

The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Bookmark and Share

National Wind Watch

HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English
Get the Facts