Quantcast
Subscribe
Key Documents
Resource Library
Research Links
Alerts
Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS
Publications & Products
Photos & Graphics
Videos
Affiliates

add NWW to your search bar ]

News Feed

RSS

Add feed to:

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)


add NWW News to your search bar ]

Categories

  • LOCATIONS
  • SOURCES
  • Archives

  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • ALL
    Powered by WordPress
    Log in

    Wind farm could be torpedoed

    The Environment Court has shaken the foundations of the Motorimu Wind Farm project by slashing the number of turbines by 40 percent, threatening to make the project unviable.

    Allco Wind Energy technical director Bernhard Voll said it would either appeal the decision, or withdraw its proposal. Allco owns the wind farm company.

    Motorimu Wind Farm had applied for consent to build wind turbines in the Tararua foothills on the border of Horowhenua and Palmerston North.

    After a series of delays, the long- awaited decision was released yesterday, cutting the number of proposed turbines from 127 to 75.

    Mr Voll said the company was pleased the decision had been released, but was disappointed with the result. “At the moment this decision, as it stands, is hardly acceptable.”

    The 52 turbines that were declined were positioned on the front ridge line of the central Tararua Ranges, known as the Te Mata ridge line, and Kaihinu Peak.

    Mr Voll said that the declined turbines were the ones that would have produced the most energy. “We might lose 40 percent of the turbines, (but) we lose more than 50 percent of the generation.”

    The company would go through the decision “line by line” to decide its next step. “As the project stands at the moment, with this decision, there won’t be a project.”

    A city council media release about the decision explained the commissioners’ reasoning.

    “The commissioners concluded that for this wind farm proposal, the benefits derived in terms of renewable energy and climate change were not of sufficient national importance, national value and benefit to justify the significant adverse effects associated with landscape, amenity and cultural issues . . .”

    It also said that reducing the number of turbines would “assist in mitigating adverse effects in terms of amenity, visual and cumulative effects, along with potential noise effects”.

    Mr Voll said it was contradictory to expect sustainable energy without any cost.

    “If New Zealand wants wind energy New Zealand has to accept that wind energy is visible. We all need renewable energy, but (people saying) ‘please put it in places where we don’t see or hear it’ just doesn’t work. You have it put it where the resource is.”

    By Katie Chapman

    Manawatu Standard

    28 June 2007

    The copyright of this article is owned by the author or publisher indicated. Its availability here constitutes a "fair use" as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law as well as in similar "fair dealing" exceptions of the copyright laws of other nations, as part of National Wind Watch's effort to advance understanding of the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development. For more information, click here.

    Blog it: 

    Tags: ,


    « Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

    National Wind Watch
    HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
    © National Wind Watch, Inc.
    Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
    "Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
    We recommend the Firefox browser.

    Get the Facts