Subscribe

News Watch

Selected Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

Help keep this education resource going strong!

Other ways to help

FAST FACTS

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

add NWW to your search bar ]

Library Feed

RSS

Add NWW documents to your site (click here)

View titles only

List alphabetically:

By Title

By Author

add NWW Docs to your search bar ]

Issues/Locations

View PDF, DOC, PPT, and XLS files on line

Resource Library Category: Alberta (3 items)

RSSAlberta

Documents presented here are not the product of nor are they necessarily endorsed by National Wind Watch. This resource library is provided to assist anyone wishing to research the issue of industrial wind power and the impacts of its development. The information should be evaluated by each reader to come to their own conclusions about the many areas of debate.


Date added:  December 22, 2009
Alberta, Denmark, Norway, WildlifePrint storyE-mail story

New publications on bats and wind turbines

Source:  Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 90

Cryan, Paul; and Barclay, Robert. 2009. Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines: Hypotheses and Predictions. Journal of Mammalogy 90, 1330-1340.

Abstract. Thousands of industrial-scale wind turbines are being built across the world each year to meet the growing demand for sustainable energy. Bats of certain species are dying at wind turbines in unprecedented numbers. Species of bats consistently affected by turbines tend to be those that rely on trees as roosts and most migrate long distances. Although considerable progress has been made in recent years toward better understanding the problem, the causes of bat fatalities at turbines remain unclear. In this synthesis, we review hypothesized causes of bat fatalities at turbines. Hypotheses of cause fall into 2 general categories proximate and ultimate. Proximate causes explain the direct means by which bats die at turbines and include collision with towers and rotating blades, and barotrauma. Ultimate causes explain why bats come close to turbines and include 3 general types: random collisions, coincidental collisions, and collisions that result from attraction of bats to turbines. The random collision hypothesis posits that interactions between bats and turbines are random events and that fatalities are representative of the bats present at a site. Coincidental hypotheses posit that certain aspects of bat distribution or behavior put them at risk of collision and include aggregation during migration and seasonal increases in flight activity associated with feeding or mating. A surprising number of attraction hypotheses suggest that bats might be attracted to turbines out of curiosity, misperception, or as potential feeding, roosting, flocking, and mating opportunities. Identifying, prioritizing, and testing hypothesized causes of bat collisions with wind turbines are vital steps toward developing practical solutions to the problem.

Download complete article: “Causes of Bat Fatalities at Wind Turbines”

Ahlén, Ingemar; Baagoe, Hans; and Bach, Lothar. 2009. Behavior of Scandinavian Bats during Migration and Foraging at Sea. Journal of Mammalogy 90, 1318-1323.

Abstract. We studied bats migrating and foraging over the sea by direct observations and automatic acoustic recording. We recorded 11 species (of a community of 18 species) flying over the ocean up to 14 km from the shore. All bats used sonar during migration flights at sea, often with slightly lower frequencies and longer pulse intervals compared to those used over land. The altitude used for migration flight was most often 10 m above sea level. Bats must use other sensory systems for long-distance navigation, but they probably use echoes from the water surface to orient to the immediate surroundings. Both migrant and resident bats foraged over the sea in areas with an abundance of insects in the air and crustaceans in the surface waters. When hunting insects near vertical objects such as lighthouses and wind turbines, bats rapidly changed altitude, for example, to forage around turbine blades. The findings illustrate why and how bats might be exposed to additional mortality by offshore wind power.

Baerwald, Erin; and Barclay, Robert. 2009. Geographic Variation in Activity and Fatality of Migratory Bats at Wind Energy Facilities. Journal of Mammalogy 90, 1341-1349.

Abstract. Little is known regarding the migratory behavior of bats, due in part to their elusive nature. Recently, however, fatalities of migratory bats at some wind energy facilities across North America have provided the opportunity and impetus to study bat migration at the landscape level. Using acoustic monitoring and carcass searches, we examined variation in activity levels and fatality rates of bats across southern Alberta, Canada, to determine if bat activity and fatality are concentrated in certain areas or evenly distributed across the landscape. To investigate geographical variation in bat activity, we acoustically monitored activity from 15 July to 15 September 2006 and 2007 at 7 proposed or existing wind energy installations across southern Alberta (~155 km between the most westerly wind energy facility and the most easterly). Activity of migratory bats varied among sites, suggesting that, rather than migrating in a dispersed way across a broad area, bats concentrate along select routes. To investigate variation in bat fatality rates among wind energy installations, we compiled fatality data collected between 2001 and 2007 from 6 wind energy facilities and conducted carcass searches at 3 wind energy installations in 2006 and 2007. Fatality rates differed among the 9 sites, partly due to differences in turbine height, but also due to differences in migratory-bat activity and the interaction between bat activity and turbine height. Our results indicate that bats migrate in certain areas and that measuring migratory activity may allow wind energy facilities to be placed so as to minimize bat fatalities.

Download complete article: “Geographic Variation in Activity and Fatality of Migratory Bats at Wind Energy Facilities”

Bookmark and Share


Real-time wind production — various regions

Source:  National Wind Watch

Note: Please be patient as this page loads — it’s pulling in a lot of data from around the world.

Australia: Daily capacity factor, production, and total demand by half-hour, by individual facilities and in total, plus annual graphs

Denmark: Current production and imports/exports (kraftwærker = power plants; windmøller = windmills; nettoudveksling = net exchange; elforbrug = electricity consumption)

Denmark: Current consumption, production, and prices

Estonia: Current production, plus graphs (“diagrams”) of past 24 hours and 7 days of six 4-Energia wind energy facilities, also webcams (total capacities: Esivere 8 MW, Pakri 18.4 MW, Tooma I 24 MW, Virtsu I-III 15 MW, Viru-Nigula 24 MW, Mockiai 12 MW, Sudenai 14 MW)

France: Quarter-hour consumption and production

Germany: Quarter-hour wind production in EnBW control area (Baden-Württemberg)

Germany: Quarter-hour wind production in 50 Hertz transmission area (northern and eastern)

Germany: Daily and monthly quarter-hour reports of predicted and actual infeed from Transpower control

Great Britain: Current, last half-hour, and last 24 hours of generation by fuel type

Great Britain: Current, weekly, monthly, yearly demand and production

Ireland: Daily quarter-hour wind generation

Portugal: Real-time wind power generation and total power demand

Spain: Real-time wind generation, with percentage of capacity and percentage of demand (may not work in all browsers)

Spain: Real-time generation from all sources (may not work in all browsers)


Alberta: Weekly wind power operational and market reports

Ontario: Daily hourly generation (scroll to bottom of table for wind plant)


Northwestern USA: Previous week, real-time 5-minute total load and wind generation, Bonneville Power Administration
BPA load and wind generation

California: Daily hourly production, CAISO
CAISO: yesterday's renewables production

North Dakota: Previous week, Basin electric Power Cooperative
Basin Electric wind generation, previous week

University of Delaware, Newark: current power output (kW) of 2,000-kW turbine

Ipswich, Massachusetts: hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly production of a 1.6-MW turbine since May 18, 2011


Falmouth, Massachusetts: hourly, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly production of a 1.65-MW turbine since March 23, 2010


Mark Richey Woodworking, Newburyport, Massachusetts: hourly, daily, monthly production of a 600-kW turbine since June 2009

Bookmark and Share


Date added:  August 27, 2008
Alberta, WildlifePrint storyE-mail story

Barotrauma is a significant cause of bat fatalities at wind turbines

Source:  Baerwald, Erin; D'Amours, Genevieve; Klug, Brandon; and Barclay, Robert

Summary. Bird fatalities at some wind energy facilities around the world have been documented for decades, but the issue of bat fatalities at such facilities — primarily involving migratory species during autumn migration — has been raised relatively recently. Given that echolocating bats detect moving objects better than stationary ones, their relatively high fatality rate is perplexing, and numerous explanations have been proposed. The decompression hypothesis proposes that bats are killed by barotrauma caused by rapid air-pressure reduction near moving turbine blades. Barotrauma involves tissue damage to air-containing structures caused by rapid or excessive pressure change; pulmonary barotrauma is lung damage due to expansion of air in the lungs that is not accommodated by exhalation. We report here the first evidence that barotrauma is the cause of death in a high proportion of bats found at wind energy facilities. We found that 90% of bat fatalities involved internal haemorrhaging consistent with barotrauma, and that direct contact with turbine blades only accounted for about half of the fatalities. Air pressure change at turbine blades is an undetectable hazard and helps explain high bat fatality rates. We suggest that one reason why there are fewer bird than bat fatalities is that the unique respiratory anatomy of birds is less susceptible to barotrauma than that of mammals.

Current Biology, Volume 18, Issue 16, 26 August 2008, Pages R695-R696

Erin F. Baerwald, Genevieve H. D’Amours, Brandon J. Klug, and Robert M.R. Barclay

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB Canada T2N 1N4

Bookmark and Share


Get the Facts
HOME ABOUT CONTACT DONATE
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material is protected by Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Click here to translate from English
Click here to translate to English

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share