<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>



<channel>
	<title>National Wind Watch: Documents &#187; Health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/category/health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents</link>
 	
	<description>Industrial Wind Resource Library, from National Wind Watch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:34:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Re: Wind Turbine Health Impact Study: Report of Independent Expert Panel</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/re-wind-turbine-health-impact-study-report-of-independent-expert-panel/</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Krogh, Carmen</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[The purpose of this letter is to respond to the Wind Turbine Health Impact Study: Report of Independent Expert Panel of January 2012 that was prepared for the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Massachusetts Department of Public Health. I would like to share excerpts from Ontario, Canada experiences regarding the serious risks to health that can occur when industrial wind turbines are sited in close proximity to residents. As background, I have held senior executive positions at a teaching hospital, .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2847</guid>
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Wind Turbine Health Impact Study Is Junk Science</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/wind-turbine-health-impact-study-is-junk-science/</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hartman, Raymond</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[[Wind Turbine Health Impact Study: Report of Independent Expert Panel, January 2012, prepared for: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Massachusetts Department of Public Health] Junk Science: What Is It? “Junk science is faulty scientific data and analysis used to advance special interests and hidden agendas.” General Examples “Government regulators may use junk science to expand their regulatory authority, increase their budgets or advance the political agenda of elected officials.” “Businesses may use junk science to bad-mouth competitors’ products, make bogus .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2844</guid>
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Pragmatic view of a wind turbine noise standard</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/pragmatic-view-of-a-wind-turbine-noise-standard/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dickinson, Philip</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract New Zealand Standard 6808:2010 Acoustics – Wind farm noise is unique in that it acknowledges, up front under committee representation, that a representative of a university involved in its development does not support the Standard. Since that time a number of papers and presentations have decried this opposition to the Standard without giving the committee member the privilege of comment or reply. This paper is to put the record straight and explain why the Standard is not supported. Wind .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2840</guid>
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Why is sharp-limited low-frequency noise extremely annoying?</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/why-is-sharp-limited-low-frequency-noise-extremely-annoying/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Krahé, Detlef</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[[Introduction] Low-frequency noise (LFN) is sound focused in the frequency range below ~100 Hz. For example, in Germany sound is defined as low frequency if the C- and A-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) differs by more than 20 dB. For a growing number of people LFN is an urgent problem, and many questions remain unanswered: Why does LFN seem to be a greater problem today than in the past? Are people more sensitive? Is LFN increasing? It can be assumed .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2825</guid>
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Re: Ministry of the Environment Media Release &#8220;Expert Report Confirms No Direct Health Effects from Wind Turbines&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/re-expert-report-confirms-no-direct-health-effects-from-wind-turbines/</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gillespie, Eric</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[We are the solicitors for Wind Concerns Ontario (&#8220;WCO&#8221;). WCO has analysed the contents of the Ministry of Environment (&#8220;MOE&#8221;) December 16, 2011 media release &#8220;Expert Report Confirms No Direct Health Effects From Wind Turbines&#8221; (the &#8220;MOE Media Release&#8221;): http://news.ontario.ca/ene/en/20ll/12/expert-report-confirms-no-direct-health-effects-from-wind-turbines.html. The apparent purpose of the MOE Media Release is to &#8220;educate&#8221; the public on matters related to wind turbine noise exposure and human health. As part of its mandate, government is responsible for providing citizens with accurate and appropriate information .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2816</guid>
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>McPherson Study: The Infrasound Smoking Gun</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/mcpherson-study-the-infrasound-smoking-gun/</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gulden, Wayne</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract McPherson is the first (and so far only) study to specifically look for the presence of excessive infrasound due to nearby wind turbines in a home that was identified by the owners as having a problem.* Two professional acousticians, Robert Rand and Steven Ambrose, lived in the home for 3 days during which they took detailed measurements of the infrasound and noted its effects upon themselves. They discovered that the infrasound often crossed the threshold of detection by the .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2811</guid>
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K.]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Wind Turbines and Proximity to Homes: The Impact of Wind Turbine Noise on Health</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/wind-turbines-and-proximity-to-homes/</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 19:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<description><![CDATA[A review of the literature &#038; discussion of the issues ~~ This paper addresses not only the issues of wind energy policy where it violates the basic living environment of families and the adverse health effects ofwind turbine noise, but also assesses the considerable number of anecdotal reports from people living with wind turbine noise. As noted in the authors&#8217; 2007 paper, although there are many who dismiss anecdotal reports as inconsequential or meaningless, these reports are from real people, .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2809</guid>
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Response to HGC Literature Review</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/response-to-hgc-literature-review/</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 14:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harrison, John</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[Response to “Low Frequency Noise and Infrasound Associated with Wind Turbine Generator Systems – A Literature Review” Also see: “Compliance Protocol for Wind Turbine Noise &#8211; Guideline for Acoustic Assessment and Measurement” Introduction The low frequency report, prepared by Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Ltd. was commissioned by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE), released in draft form in August 2010, released in final form to MOE in December 2010 and to the public in August 2011. Why MOE is issuing it .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2804</guid>
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Unvarnished Truth: Shirley Wind Project Health Impacts</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/shirley-wind-project-health-impacts/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 03:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Forest Voice</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[At least eight families in Shirley, WI, in the Town of Glenmore just south of Green Bay, are reporting health problems and quality of life issues since the Shirley Wind project went online in December of 2010. Six families have come forward, five of them testify on the video, and at this time two of them have vacated their homes. STAND UP to protect people, livestock, pets, and wildlife against negligent and irresponsible placement of industrial wind turbines. Click here .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2803</guid>
<enclosure url="http://video.wind-watch.org/Shirley-Wind-Project.mp4" length="72556953" type="video/mp4" />
		</item>
					<item>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category>Wind power</category>
		<category>Wind energy</category>
		<title>Nina Pierpont interviews acoustician Stephen Ambrose</title>
		<link>http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/nina-pierpont-interviews-acoustician-stephen-ambrose/</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pierpont, Nina</dc:creator>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Nina Pierpont, PhD (Princeton), MD (Johns Hopkins), interviews acoustician Stephen Ambrose on his work. She asks him about the strange malady that plagued him after he went to work taking sound measurements at a house near a 1.65-MW Vestas wind turbine where the residents were complaining of bad health since the turbine went on line. He tells Dr. Pierpont that even while setting up in the house he began to feel strangely unwell, as did his co-worker. Something is .&#160;.&#160;.]]></description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wind-watch.org/documents/?p=2797</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

