These postings are provided to help publicize the efforts of affiliated groups and individuals related to industrial wind energy development. Most of the notices posted here are not the product of nor are they necessarily endorsed by National Wind Watch.
Aesthetics, Environment, Information, Maine, Noise, Property values •
Source: Posted by Brad Blake on August 13, 2015, windtaskforce.org
An erstwhile wind warrior grabbed his camera this week and sent in these sad photos of the Oakfield Wind project, still under construction, but with enough turbines up so the impact is clear. First Wind bamboozled the Town of Oakfield with a so-called collaboration with a poor town that was eager for tax revenues and landowners eager to get leasing income. Again, First Wind laughs all the way to the bank, having taken over the town at a cheap, rock-bottom price. Then DEP Commissioner Aho allowed First Wind to take the existing license and enormously expand it: 50 turbines, not 38; 479 ft tall structures, not 389 ft. Bigger, noisier, greater impact zone, including the high quality Pleasant Lake and Mattawamkeag Lake. All this with one lousy public comment meeting and not forcing First Wind to submit a new application with a new starting point for the permitting. Here are the results:
Aesthetics, Announcements, Economics, Maine, Publications •
Source: Meryl L. Moss Media Relations
Some of America’s most corrupt politicians can be found in the windswept wilds of Maine. The Pine Tree State rates next-to-last in citizens’ trust of their legislators according to the Gallup Poll (April 4, 2014), and the Center for Public Integrity gives the state an F for corruption. Maine politicians appropriate taxpayer funds for their own companies, while governors pass legislation for huge energy projects which they then create companies to run. And energy companies write laws protecting their projects, laws that are obligingly passed verbatim by politicians who receive major payoffs from these companies.
The Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting recently revealed that former state Senate President Justin Alfond introduced bills in the Senate written entirely by energy industry lawyers, after the industry awarded him with major donations to his Political Action Committee, funds which he then used to pay other Democrats so they would vote for him as state Senate President.
Similarly, hedge fund billionaire Donald Sussman, until recently the owner of most Maine newspapers, and the recipient of $200 million in taxpayer bailouts, was a major funder of an energy company now destroying Maine’s mountains, and whose previous Italian partners have been jailed in the largest Mafia bust in Italian history. His wife, Maine Congresswoman Chellie Pingree, helped former Maine governor Angus King get a fraudulent $102 million taxpayer loan for energy projects he then made millions on, some of which he then used to buy his current seat in the US Senate.
This scandalous real-life situation is the setting for best-selling author Mike Bond’s newest super-thriller, KILLING MAINE. Bond’s most popular character, internationally known surfer and Special Forces veteran Pono Hawkins, leaves the sun-drenched beaches of Hawaii for Maine’s brutal winter to help his former SF buddy Bucky Franklin who has been charged with murder. Pono quickly learns that Maine is as politically corrupt as Hawaii, with multinational corporations buying up the state’s scenic mountains and purchasing its politicians at bargain prices. Pono is hunted, shot at, betrayed and stalked by knife-wielding assassins as he tries to find the real murderer. Nothing is certain. No one can be trusted. No place is safe. The woman he loves vanishes and he is charged with her disappearance. And with a rap sheet that includes two underserved jail sentences, Pono is a target for every cop in Maine.
MIKE BOND is a best-selling novelist who has covered death squads, guerrilla wars and military dictatorships in Latin America and Africa; Islamic terrorism in the Middle East and Europe; and environmental issues worldwide. A Maine native whose family has lived there since the 1600s, he has written a book for the Sierra Club on Maine’s Allagash River and has been active in numerous other battles to protect Maine’s magnificent and endangered outdoors. Bond writes and gives frequent testimony and interviews worldwide on wilderness protection, endangered species, elephant poaching, wolves, whales, tigers, raptors, rain forests, climate change, renewable energy and ecosystem loss. He is the master of the socially conscious thriller.
The Den Brook Judicial Review Group (DBJRG) regrets that the need has arisen to publicly issue the Den Brook wind farm developer, Renewable Energy Systems (RES), with a pre-action protocol Notice of Intent to establish both audible EAM and sub-audible infra-sound noise monitoring.
The need has arisen due to continued disingenuous responses and malfeasant submissions from the developer and its agents. This has been the case throughout DBJRG’s longstanding efforts for obtaining effective conditions and controls to properly protect neighbours against Excessive Amplitude Modulation (EAM) noise impacts from the proposed wind turbine development.
It is further regretted that financial investment and support for the project may become compromised through implications flowing from service of the pre-action protocol Notice.
Monitoring is to be professionally established on behalf of the DBJRG similar to the model currently in action at the Cotton Farm wind farm in Huntingdonshire. Live, 24/7 audio recordings and interactive noise charts will be made available and accessible to all through a dedicated website.
All breaches of condition assessed in accordance with the Den Brook planning approval’s condition 21 Written Scheme alongside assessment directly according with the EAM parameters established by condition 20 will be logged thus enabling world-wide scrutiny of the proposed 9 × 120m Den Brook wind turbines.
Moreover, if, as suspected, the condition 21 Written Scheme fails to trigger measures to address and mitigate EAM contrary to condition 20, the matter will continue to be pursued with vigour.
DBJRG holds the view that recently adopted proposals from developer RES in terms of EAM noise compliance testing are significantly flawed. Furthermore, such flaws not only ominously and materially prejudice neighbours of the proposed Den Brook wind farm and hold serious implications in relation to Article 8 of the Human Rights convention, but fly directly in the face of an extant 2011 Court of Appeal ruling.
—26 May 2015
The Notice served this day, 26 May 2015, on RES together with detailed background information can be found in the attached full copy of the ‘Notice of Intent to carry out noise monitoring – 26 May 2015’.
Source: National Wind Watch
Is National Wind Watch a resource that is valuable to you?
How much is it worth – to you – to keep it going?
Every day, thousands of people like you around the world view the wind-watch.org web site. Thousands more rely NWW’s news and documents presented on other web sites, on Facebook and Twitter, and in the daily e-mail newsletter.
Today, National Wind Watch celebrates 10 years of providing the tools and information needed for citizens, ecologists and policymakers to make informed decisions concerning the impacts of wind energy development.
From NWW’s origins at the first-in-the-nation gatherings of industrial wind stakeholders from around the U.S. in 2005 and 2006, your organization has grown to undisputed primacy in reporting on and publishing news, research papers, opinion essays and artistic endeavors, all painstakingly collected, curated, and – perhaps most importantly – presented in a context that focuses primarily on the issues that matter most: the impacts of wind energy development on people, our environment, our economy, and our quality of life.
It hasn’t always been easy. We’ve had to face down some bad players who tried to destroy our organization from within as well as resist attempts to co-opt our efforts by special interest groups with deep pockets to advance their own narrow agendas. We’ve also had to fend off lawsuits from media companies who wanted to maintain a monopoly on the information you rely on. And we’ve responded to repeated attacks from the wind industry itself.
Despite these challenges, National Wind Watch established and redoubled its position as the most used and most respected source of wind-related information on the web, and has facilitated countless countless interpersonal and interorganizational connections that resonate around the globe.
“Wind 2050” is a government and industry funded project in Denmark studying international resistance to large-scale wind energy development. In their graphic statistical analysis of the wind information web, wind-watch.org stands out as the most prominent site (the largest circle), referred to by more wind sites than any other. That graphic conveniently expresses what many of you already know, and what motivates your board of directors to advance our efforts: NWW’s work has become crucial to extending awareness of industrial wind to a growing, and global, network.
As National Wind Watch reaches 10 years of service, we’re reflecting on the impact we’ve had, assessing our financial situation, and considering how best to continue.
While the organization is staffed entirely by volunteers who receive no compensation, the cost of technology to keep up with steadily rising web and mobile traffic demands, as well as maintaining a robust defense against legal challenges, continue to rise. There are many developing opportunities to increase public exposure of the issues surrounding industrial wind development, but without a sufficient war-chest, NWW cannot take advantage of many of them.
But you can change that.
Five dollars, euros, pounds, kroner, etc. – whatever you can spare: consider a special 10th anniversary donation. And if you can afford more, please give what you think is appropriate. Planned giving is another way to ensure that your contribution will endure. Read more at wind-watch.org/donate.
U.S. contributions are tax-deductible.
Use one of the buttons above, go to wind-watch.org/donate to contribute, or mail your check today to: Treasurer, National Wind Watch, 63 West Hill Road, Hawley, MA 01339 (USA).
Please share this post with your network of supporters.
We thank you!
Campaigns, Health, Protests, Wisconsin •
Source: Brown County Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy
Numerous residents living in, or in the environs of, Duke Energy’s Shirley Wind project in the Town of Glenmore, Wisconsin, are now displaying 4′ × 4′ yard signs stating what the Brown County Board of Health officially declared, namely, that the Shirley Wind turbines are “a human health hazard”. There are now 20 families displaying the signs, many of which are shown below.
All photos by courtesy of Brown County Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy, from whom high-resolution copies are available.
The rush to go green is pitting corporations against residents, government against citizens, neighbour against neighbour. Through the process the people are being stripped of their due democratic process.
Big Wind is a story of unethical political systems, corporate greed, and ordinary citizens who have had enough and are standing up to big government and big business. They are part of a growing revolution in rural communities in Southern Ontario and around the globe – people fighting to defend their homes, their way of life and the environment against Big Wind. It is a battle that will profoundly impact the green movement, as well as the well being of citizens in Canada and citizens worldwide for years to come.
Big Wind is a surprising and compelling documentary about the unprecedented rush to develop industrial wind turbines and how this is transforming the landscape in Canada and the world. The film investigates why governments are spending billions on wind power without first conducting health and environmental studies, why corporations are grabbing up precious farmland to put up hundreds of thousands of enormous industrial wind turbines, why people living near the turbines are falling ill, losing their animals and their farms, and whether these new “green” wind turbines are actually helping our environmental aims.
Note: This public release is an expanded version from the version broadcast in March and available until March 25, 2021, at TVO.